苹果关闭双重认证
arecentpollintheregisteraskedwhoismoreclosed，Microsoft or Apple？ awhopping 55 % ofrespondentsthoughtthatdubioushonorbelongstoapple (21 % said Microsoft，and 24 % saidtheywerebothequalsinthematte
《The Register》在最近进行的民意调查中，询问了微软和苹果哪个更封闭。 55%的受访者认为可疑荣誉属于苹果公司(21%表示微软，24%表示他们在这件事上是平等的)。
even though apple’scurrentoperatingsystemisbuiltontopofanopensourceunixbase，andeventhoughtheirwebrowserisbuiltontheopenopensourensoure applehasnotoriouslyalwaysbeenclose.themostpopularreasonpeopleperceivedappleasmoreclosedthanmicrosoftintheregister’spolllwas
即使苹果当前的操作系统基于开源UNIX平台，Web浏览器基于开源WebKit呈现引擎，苹果也是臭名昭著的。 Register的民意调查认为，苹果比微软更封闭的原因是其产品线的端到端独特性。
" whether it’sosxbeingweddedtothemac，theipodbeingdependentontheitunesservice，oriphonesoftwaredistributionbeingcontrollllledvedvingcongcollledededvedvervinthontemac thereisastrongperceptionthatopennessisnotalwaysthebiggestpriorition
“无论是将OS X绑定到Mac、将iPod依赖于iTunes服务还是通过苹果线下零售店控制iPhone软件的发布，我们都强烈认为开放性并不一定是苹果的首选，”Dale解释说。 太恶毒了。
itiscertainlytruethatapplelikestoretaincompletecontrolovertheirproducts.byonlyallowingosxtorunonhardwaretheycreate，for example applenotonlycontrolsthepricingoftheirproductsbuttheyalsolimitthepossibilityofhardwareincompatibilityissuesthatdegradeuserexperexperesttttthonchored rivingforcebehindallappleproductsitismaintainingahighqualityuserexperience。
苹果喜欢保留对产品的完全控制权。 例如，通过确保只有OS X在创建的硬件上运行，苹果不仅可以控制产品的价格，还可以限制导致用户体验降低的硬件不兼容性问题的可能性。 而且，只要所有苹果产品背后都有驱动力，就能够维持高质量的用户体验。
This time around，therealbattleforcontrolofourcomputinglivesmightbetakingplaceonthemobileplatformandontheweb.it’slessaboutweb andmoreaboutiphonevs.blackberry vs.Android vs.windows mobile.andasfarhadmanjoowonders，“hasn’tstevejobslearnedandred”
这次，控制我们计算机生活的真正战斗可能发生在移动平台和网络上。 与Windows、Linux、OS X无关，与iPhone、黑莓、Android、Windows Mobile有关。 就像BZDXT(Farh )一样
ad Manjoo)所想 ，“wmdqt(Steve Jobs)在过去30年中没有学到任何东西吗？”“Watching Google and Apple carve out space in the mobile business, one can hardly avoid thinking that history is repeating itself. In the 1970s and ’80s, Apple created the first great personal computers. But because Apple closed its platform, it was IBM, Dell, HP, and especially Microsoft that reaped the benefits of Apple’s innovations,” wrote Manjoo recently in an article on Slate.com. “The Mac’s operating system ran only on Mac computers; Windows ran on lots of lots of different companies’ hardware. This made non-Apple computers both cheaper than Apple’s machines—competition between hardware manufacturers pushed down prices—and more useful, as third-party developers flocked to write must-have programs for Windows. Apple seems to be following a similar restrictive strategy with the iPhone.”
“看着Google和Apple开拓移动业务的空间，人们几乎无法避免以为历史在重演。 在1970年代和80年代，苹果公司创造了第一批出色的个人计算机。 但是因为苹果关闭了平台，所以IBM，戴尔，惠普，尤其是微软从苹果的创新中受益匪浅。” Manjoo最近在Slate.com上的一篇文章中写道。 “ Mac的操作系统仅在Mac计算机上运行； Windows在许多不同公司的硬件上运行。 由于第三方开发人员蜂拥而至，为Windows编写必备程序，这使得非Apple的计算机既比Apple的计算机便宜，又使硬件制造商之间的竞争降低了价格，并且更加有用。 苹果似乎对iPhone采取了类似的限制性策略。”
Manjoo theorizes that perhaps Jobs thinks that this time around people are more keen on user experience and minimization of headaches than they are concerned with openness. “An open platform is much more technically complex than a closed one,” says Manjoo, noting that open platforms have more technical problems because they have to play nice with a wider variety of technology, and that they attract unsavory developers (i.e., makers of viruses and spyware), all of which hurts end user experience.
Manjoo认为，也许敏感的未来认为这次人们比对开放性的关注更热衷于用户体验和头痛的减少。 Manjoo说：“开放平台比封闭平台在技术上要复杂得多。”他指出，开放平台存在更多技术问题，因为它们必须与更广泛的技术配合使用，而且它们吸引了不讨人喜欢的开发人员(例如，病毒和间谍软件)，所有这些都会损害最终用户的体验。
However, as we noted in August, closed platforms often put developers at odds with the platform providers, which can ultimately drive developers toward alternatives. Applications are the life’s blood of any platform. So if closed platforms end up protecting user experience at the expense of maintaining a wide variety of helpful applications, then openness will eventually win.
但是，正如我们在8月所指出的那样 ，封闭的平台通常会使开发人员与平台提供者产生分歧，最终可能会促使开发人员转向替代方案。 应用程序是任何平台的生命。 因此，如果封闭的平台最终以维护各种有用的应用程序为代价来保护用户体验，那么开放最终将赢得胜利。
If the Register’s poll is any indication of general sentiment, Jobs might have made another miscalculation and could pay for it in the long term. And, as CNET points out, Apple is starting to take some very Microsoft-like action against rivals to protect its monopolies. That’s a dangerous road for Apple to take and one that could shift public perception of the company, which is anecdotally very positive right now.
如果登记册的民意测验显示出总体情绪，则敏感的未来可能又做出了错误的估算，并且可以长期支付。 而且，正如CNET所指出的那样 ，苹果公司开始采取类似于微软的行动对付竞争对手，以保护其垄断地位。 对于苹果公司而言，这是一条危险的道路，并且可能会改变公众对该公司的看法，这在目前看来是非常积极的。
翻译自: https://www.sitepoint.com/can-closed-work-for-apple-this-time/
apple 关闭双重认证