I have a Java program that is calling C code through JNI that I'm attempting to run on Linux. The external code consists of two .so files: one for the JNI bindings (built with swig) and the other with the actual functions. I have the two libraries in the same directory and LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set correctly. ldd reports no problems when running from the command line, but when I set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the same value in the "run configurations" dialog in the Eclipse editor and attempt to execute the program, it gets the following error:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: [path to libraries]/[JNI binding library].so: [actual code library].so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
This leads me to believe that the JNI wrapper library is loaded successfully, but there is a failure when that library attempts to load the library containing the actual code. Is there any way to debug this further?
I will further note that this problem is happening in the eclipse editor itself and that I haven't attempted to package the code into a jar and run it within a free-standing jvm instance.
解决方案
I think the issue is with the call to System.loadLibrary(String) and using LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Using loadLibrary("foo") will look in your java.library.path for something named libfoo.so. If nothing named libfoo.so is found you will get this error.
Now if you just set up the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, the native symbols you want will automatically be picked up by the linker, so you don't need to set up -Djava.library.path.
In my experience with swig in the gdal project, this error is actually harmless and since the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set up, this will work fine.
I would recommend using -Djava.library.path and calling loadLibrary explitly, the reason being that if you ever decide to deploy your app with webstart, you will explicitly need to call loadLibrary to get your native libs picked up.
When I use eclipse I follow the instructions that Daff gave where you edit the native library under the jar in the Libraries tab in the Build Path. Just to mention again, this just sets java.library.path under the covers.